@PGC excellent responses, although they seem like water off a duck's back. On Thursday 24 October 2024 at 18:09:02 UTC+13 Cosmin Visan wrote:
> @PGC. Now it makes sense. So you are a fat loser that is jelous on people > that take care of their bodies. So you rejoice when similar losers take > power. You imagine that this will change women preferences and finally a > loser like him will get a woman. Wait, where did I hear this before ? > Aaa... those proletariat communist losers that killed their elites because > they couldnt get to their level and ruined their countries culturally and > economically. All in the name of progress, of course, lol. That's why only > because these woke companies go broke is not a guarantee that this will > deter the wokies. They dont care about money. All they care is revenge on > successful people. And if this means turning their country in a third world > slum, they are ok with that, as long as everyone gets to be as miserable as > them. > > On Thursday 24 October 2024 at 00:35:50 UTC+3 PGC wrote: > >> Agreed. But we can't have a racially diverse set of supermodels wielding >> lightsabers. Instead, 'normal guys' have to insist that only Cbum-type men >> with *rectus femoris* like tree trunks can wield lightsabers. Who's >> queer now? >> >> On Wednesday, October 23, 2024 at 9:23:20 PM UTC+2 Brent Meeker wrote: >> >> And I thought it was because they are so much nicer to look at. >> >> Brent >> >> >> On 10/22/2024 7:53 AM, PGC wrote: >> > The presence of female heroes is not evidence of a conspiracy, but >> > rather part of a broader and overdue shift towards diversity in >> > storytelling. >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/4f42f65f-08b9-4295-8b3e-e11ff1d14004n%40googlegroups.com.
