By claiming that the motive behind advocating science, equality, peoples' 
right to representation etc. is some bizarre desire to be the “last man 
standing,” the insult again sidesteps any real conversation and instead 
dives into personal attacks that aim to embarrass or discredit without 
substance. You're now officially spamming the list as its the same tactic 
several times a day. 

"Real men" in that sense however... are original. Or is this some kick you 
get... running around misrepresenting ideas of others as your own, claiming 
credit, playing the bully you don't have the balls to be in real life? 
Don't you have *anything* original to say about these topics yourself? Just 
the toothless, touristic, unimaginative, and juvenile insults?

Reflect for once on what you want, now that you've clearly exposed my 
elaborate plan for endless seduction through promoting super model 
representation in badly written, insufficiently financed Star Wars series 
and games... in some obscure online context. 

Then remind yourself: You're the guy who wants name recognition from an 
academia he doesn't believe in to fix the woke mind virus through watching 
more male classic physique representation in Star Wars and Games; as if 
this hadn't saturated the market with Arnold, Conan etc. Yeah, I'm sure you 
work out lots, which with your "style of reasoning" probably means: the 
forearm of your dominant hand must be well developed. You might win the 
appropriate competition, which also contextualizes the anger. Pretending 
you lead this hedonic sexual life out there in your province with the 
asymmetry in your forearms, while in the closet for classic men's 
physiques.  

It's clear you'll need to keep spamming more of the same. But it's all 
water off a duck's back for you too. So go ahead and do exactly what I 
predict you to do.

On Sunday, October 27, 2024 at 9:57:05 PM UTC+1 Cosmin Visan wrote:

> @Alan. How about your reason for wanting to exterminate normal white men ? 
> What did they ever do to you that you hate them so much ?
>
> On Sunday 27 October 2024 at 21:53:21 UTC+2 Alan Grayson wrote:
>
>> On Sunday, October 27, 2024 at 1:28:50 PM UTC-6 Cosmin Visan wrote:
>>
>> @PGC. All the clues point to the fact that you lack a woman in your life. 
>> That's where all your obsession with the extermination of men come from. 
>> You imagine that by remaining the only man alive, all women will come to 
>> you and you will have unlimited sex, thus taking revenge for your old age 
>> virginity.
>>
>>
>> *You demonstrate that if God exists, He/She must be extremely kind -- in 
>> the sense of concealing from your consciousness what an ABSOLUTE SCHMCK you 
>> are!  You have no shame for regularly posting unadulterated CRAP, that is 
>> SHIT, so much so, I wouldn't waste my time reading your theory of 
>> consciousness, showing you have ZERO genuine self-awareness.  I hope I have 
>> the self discipline to make this my LAST reply to your offensive and 
>> ill-informed accustions. FU, AG *
>>
>>
>> On Sunday 27 October 2024 at 19:10:32 UTC+2 PGC wrote:
>>
>> Correction to my post re Griffin. I was referring to his position here:
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oq-8Umqsq7A
>>
>> It appears I need to make a correction regarding Griffin—consider it my 
>> own little lesson in risk management! Initially, due to the interview, I 
>> thought Griffin was firmly in one camp he's actually hedging his bets. 
>> According to his recent statements, he's "torn" and hasn't financially 
>> backed Trump, admitting he won't be voting with a "smile on his face" since 
>> neither candidate is winning any awards for their policies or leadership.
>>
>> So, just as any reasonable person adjusts their strategy based on the 
>> latest market data, I'm updating my own views in light of this new 
>> information. It's that easy, guys... To say: "I was wrong and correct 
>> myself." My testosterone levels will remain what they are.
>>
>> @ Alan: No capitulation. Just a recognition that I do not control 
>> insecurity in men and remain prepared for major lemonade production.
>>
>> On Sunday, October 27, 2024 at 5:18:58 PM UTC+1 PGC wrote:
>>
>> On Sunday, October 27, 2024 at 5:02:45 PM UTC+1 Alan Grayson wrote:
>>
>>  . 
>>
>> *"I've embraced a Trump win for some time now, the resulting tax benefits 
>> of interests in the US, made appropriate plans, and seeing the new 
>> opportunities it would open up, even if it all is driven by the inadequate 
>> penis mindset."*
>>
>> *In the final analysis, the author has capitulated to the Evil whose 
>> origin he describes so well. Utterly shameful and unforgivable. AG*
>>
>>
>> You are too quick in judgement and loose accuracy: Embracing the 
>> possibility of a Trump win does not mean that this is the outcome I prefer. 
>> You miss the context. I manage risks the way that any reasonable person 
>> does: Assume the worst, and be prepared for it. Any other outcome is a 
>> bonus. 
>>
>> And this is informed by experience of a family that has seen all of this 
>> before and lost everything in World War 2. 
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/4887a1b3-9996-4183-b28d-f668afae206bn%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to