Only in Dempocrat Party run precincts was the notion that non-citizens vote.In
Virginia, despite the move by the DOJ, non-citizens were purged from the voter
roles. The result of a district court ruling.
On Tuesday, November 5, 2024 at 01:07:00 PM EST, PGC
<[email protected]> wrote:
In evaluating these claims, it’s essential to consider the broader context of
how social media and news platforms increasingly drive political discourse.
These platforms are designed to generate outrage, as it has been shown to be
the most engaging and profitable form of content, particularly in an
advertising-driven model. Outrage keeps people engaged, producing clicks,
shares, and ad revenue; consequently, the cycle of moral indignation and
sensationalism is incentivized, often at the expense of factual accuracy.
Verifying facts is slower and less stimulating, so audiences are drawn instead
to provocative arguments, insults, and demeaning language. This is especially
compelling for lonely or isolated individuals, who may be more inclined to take
what they see online at face value and to seek out emotionally charged content
as a source of connection or validation.
Returning to the specific points raised: inflation is a complex economic
phenomenon shaped by many factors, including global supply chain issues and
energy markets, not just government spending on social programs. The narrative
that inflation is solely the result of “printing money for illegal immigrants”
oversimplifies the issue and plays into the kind of sensational arguments that
drive clicks.
Similarly, the Inflation Reduction Act’s EV infrastructure funding is part of a
multi-year plan, with charger installation targets set over several years
rather than immediate fulfillment. Yet, in an outrage-driven media cycle,
claims that “billions yielded only a few chargers” are more compelling than
examining the complexities of infrastructure projects and implementation
timelines.
On immigration, accusations that Democrats welcome illegal immigration to
“fatten votes” are unsupported by evidence, as U.S. voting laws restrict
ballots to citizens, and claims of mass voter fraud involving undocumented
immigrants have been consistently debunked. However, accusations like this,
particularly when unsupported, are highly engaging and designed to stoke fears
and divide audiences. They reinforce sensational narratives that resonate more
strongly than the nuanced realities of immigration and voting policies. The
notion that members of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard are entering the
country, without verifiable intelligence backing, also reflects the sort of
dramatic, fear-based storytelling that online and traditional media alike
exploit for engagement.
The Afghanistan withdrawal, though chaotic, cannot be directly linked as the
primary reason for Putin’s invasion of Ukraine. Putin’s actions were influenced
by a range of long-term strategic factors that predate Biden’s presidency.
However, the simplistic narrative that one event signals “weakness” and spurs
aggression is easier to digest and more inflammatory than considering the
actual geopolitical complexities at play.
Finally, the notion that Democrats “adore” or ignore street crime misrepresents
the intentions of criminal justice reform, which aims to address systemic
issues rather than enable criminal activity. Traditional media, in striving to
remain relevant alongside social media’s outrage-fueled dynamics, often
promotes the idea that certain parties are “soft on crime,” which adds fuel to
partisan narratives without addressing the real issues behind reform efforts.
The drive for clicks and engagement has shaped the very way we understand
political discourse today, with social media and traditional news alike
incentivized to promote content that divides and provokes rather than informs.
Voting on policies is valid and necessary, but making choices based on
outrage-driven narratives can obscure the facts and perpetuate division. The
question remains: does voting based on such narratives—particularly for
candidates who capitalize on them—truly help address the deeper issues
affecting our society? Or does it merely reinforce a cycle where public
attention is manipulated for profit, rather than fostering informed and
meaningful political engagement?
This environment, fueled by outrage and sensationalism, risks diminishing our
collective ability to navigate complex issues thoughtfully and cooperatively.
And you've completely bought into this, vote emotionally "with pleasure", and
will opportunistically accept a win while claiming that voting is rigged.
Pretending to vote on policy while buying every engagement oriented moral
outrage narrative the internet algorithms/trolls manipulate you with, is what
it is.
On Tuesday, November 5, 2024 at 5:07:40 PM UTC+1 [email protected] wrote:
Not really.
My voting is on policies, whether kamala did these, I would've voted for her.
Domestically, Inflation caused by printing money to cover social expenses for
illegal aliens.The Inflation Reduction Act was raided. Specially,7.5 billion,
reserved for vastly increasing the amount of EV chargers, would up with only 8.
Illegal immigration to fatten the Dem election votes, not caring whether some
of the entrants were criminals or Iranian Rev Guard Units, in country.
Internationally, the Afghanistan witrhdrawal caused Putin to see Weakness aka
like Obama, and invade Ukraine, causing the Doomsday clock to go forward. That
is just four reasons, and 5 would be the democrats adoration and non-jailing of
street thugs, and theft. .
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/9945eee9-36fa-4292-9b41-0112fd5a2b92n%40googlegroups.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/74958407.5975671.1730921252359%40mail.yahoo.com.
