On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 9:13 PM Brent Meeker <[email protected]> wrote:
> *I'd heard that the **many of "Many Worlds" referred to the numerosity of > possible measurement results. Is that not right?* *Yes that would be a correct statement because, as I said before, every measurement is a change but not every change is a measurement. In one world the needle on your voltmeter is pointing to 3 and you observe it pointing to 3, and in another world the needle on your voltmeter is pointing to 4 and you observe it pointing to 4. And you are an intelligent agent, perhaps even a conscious one, therefore you are capable of making a measurement. * *I've noticed that you have not mentioned what your favorite quantum interpretation is, nor has Bruce Kellett, but if I were to guess I would say both of you are fans of the Shut Up And Calculate (a.k.a. Copenhagen) quantum interpretation. Am I correct? * *John K Clark See what's on my new list at Extropolis <https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis>* qcn -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv2beEjL5m2AGuuwyJCYsu_SoLqeL_8hJEoL%3DiFi-A5gjA%40mail.gmail.com.
