On Sun, Dec 29, 2024 at 5:10 PM Alan Grayson <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> On Sunday, December 29, 2024 at 3:01:11 PM UTC-7 Brent Meeker wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On 12/29/2024 2:03 AM, Alan Grayson wrote:
>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dDqUbBYpB_k#:~:text=from%20the%20car's%20reference%20rate%20however%20the,will%20get%20smashed%20by%20the%20garage%20doors.&text=in%20order%20to%20find%20out%20we%20must,use%20our%20friends%20the%20lorentz%20transformation%20equations
> .
>
>
> They are just calculating the position of the ends of the car in the
> garage frame so it it is contracted.
>
> Brent
>
>
> Does it show the car fits from the car frame, which is the claim? Maybe
> this video is better. AG
>
>  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4HtKe9POc_Q
>


Do you watch these videos all the way through before posting links? In this
one he says at 4:35 that "the solution to our paradox" is that while the
doors are able to close simultaneously in the barn's frame with the pole
inside, in the pole's frame the door closings are not simultaneous. After
actually calculating the times in the pole frame using the LT, he says at
6:45 "Just think about what this means: the time that the back door closes
is significantly before the front door closes. In other words, as the barn
is moving towards the pole, the back door closes momentarily and then opens
up immediately after. And when the back of the pole enters the barn the
front door closes. So the closing of the doors that occurred simultaneously
in one frame of reference does not occur simultaneously in the other frame
of reference, and our paradox is resolved."

Jesse

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAPCWU3LEP6eXGzq9TMocC%3Dt3z5vgcoWmJSTF3362tjOFbH2iUw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to