On Sunday, December 29, 2024 at 3:01:11 PM UTC-7 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 12/29/2024 2:03 AM, Alan Grayson wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dDqUbBYpB_k#:~:text=from%20the%20car's%20reference%20rate%20however%20the,will%20get%20smashed%20by%20the%20garage%20doors.&text=in%20order%20to%20find%20out%20we%20must,use%20our%20friends%20the%20lorentz%20transformation%20equations . They are just calculating the position of the ends of the car in the garage frame so it it is contracted. Brent The sound on that video was poor at the end, so I wasn't sure what was proven. However, their last words was that the car also fits from car frame. So why do you say the car is contracted in the car frame, as if that's the only thing they established, which doesn't touch on the paradox? More important is what your plots prove. Please just state in text what you proved. TY, AG -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/ce81f8e4-8dfa-4ac8-944d-ac744f1cc8edn%40googlegroups.com.
