Universe doesn't exist. "Universe" is just an idea in consciousness.

On Monday, 23 December 2024 at 16:30:04 UTC+2 John Clark wrote:

> *There is a radical new paper in the December 19 issue of the journal 
> Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society that claims Dark Energy 
> does not exist and the universe is not accelerating, I don't know if it's 
> right or not but it's certainly interesting. It says recent observation 
> show that the universe is lumpier than previously thought, and clocks run 
> slower in a gravitational field, so a clock in the Milky Way, where there's 
> a lot of matter nearby and thus in a strong gravitational field, would run 
> about 35% slower than a clock that was in one of the larger Cosmic Voids 
> where there is little matter nearby and therefore is in a weak 
> gravitational field. Therefore  for us in the Milky Way it would look like 
> the void was getting larger at an accelerating rate.*
> *David Wiltshire, the leader of the study said  "Our findings show that we 
> do not need dark energy to explain why the universe appears to expand at an 
> accelerating rate. Dark energy is a misidentification of variations in the 
> kinetic energy of expansion, which is not uniform in a universe as lumpy as 
> the one we actually live in." *
>
> *They call their new idea "the timescape framework", and the paper 
> concludes with this:* 
>
> * "The timescape framework is consistent with new analysis of void 
> statistics in numerical relativity simulations using the full Einstein 
> equations. These are consistent with an emerging kinetic spatial curvature 
> of voids on small scales. Much remains to be done in calibrating the dark 
> matter fraction, primordial sound speed and the BAO [Baryon Acoustic 
> Oscillations] scale. However, new results are likely to provide a robust 
> framework for this. Our results imply profound consequences for cosmology 
> and astrophysics. Indeed, a net preference for the timescape cosmology over 
> the standard FLRW [Friedmann-Lemaıtre-Robertson-Walker metric] cosmologies 
> may point to a need for revision of the foundations of theoretical 
> cosmology, both ontologically and epistemologically, to better understand 
> inhomogeneities and their backreaction on the average evolution of the 
> Universe."*
>
>
> *Supernovae evidence for foundational change to cosmological models 
> <https://academic.oup.com/mnrasl/article/537/1/L55/7926647?login=false>*
>
> *John K Clark    See what's on my new list at  Extropolis 
> <https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis>*
> pct
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/7ab57ba3-c37c-4cdb-8d44-45648756b092n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to