On Friday, February 14, 2025 at 11:06:42 PM UTC-7 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 2/14/2025 3:23 PM, Alan Grayson wrote: On Wednesday, February 12, 2025 at 12:36:38 PM UTC-7 Brent Meeker wrote: On 2/12/2025 12:55 AM, Alan Grayson wrote: If the age of the universe is finite, which is generally believed, then no matter how fast it expands, it can never become spatially infinite, So,* IF* it is spatially infinite, this must have been its initial condition at or around he time of the Big Bang (BB). But this contradicts the assumption that it was at a super high temperature at or around the time of the BB. No it doesn't. I can be infinite and high temperature. What gave you idea it couldn't? IOW, if we run the clock backward, the universe seems to get incredibly small, If the universe is infinite, then it is only the Observable Universe that gets incredibly small. *Is there any principle you are aware of, which prevents an infinite universe from becoming incredible small? * *It would have to undergo an infinite change in size in a finite time, which would require infinite relative velocities. Brent* *I can't imagine a universe starting as infinite in spatial extent -- can you? -- which is why I imagine it finite in the beginning, and because of its finite age, it can never become infinite in spatial extent. AG* -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/5eed98c8-6c99-4ff7-8d10-d7a9035e3774n%40googlegroups.com.
