On Saturday, February 15, 2025 at 3:32:14 PM UTC-7 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 2/15/2025 9:45 AM, Alan Grayson wrote: When I studied QM, wf's were solutions of specific differential equations, such as S's equation. But S's equation is non-relativistic since it uses classical energy, and hence the energy operator derived from classical physics. So what differential equation exists from which we can solve to find something remotely approximating a universal wave function? Dirac's equation? Or do we just pull it out of the proverbial hat and move on? AG -- The New Minimal Standard Model Hooman Davoudiasl, Ryuichiro Kitano, Tianjun Li, and Hitoshi Murayama ∗ School of Natural Sciences, Institute for Advanced Study, Einstein Drive, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA (Dated: May 11, 2004) We construct the New Minimal Standard Model that incorporates the new discoveries of physics beyond the Minimal Standard Model (MSM): Dark Energy, non-baryonic Dark Matter, neutrino masses, as well as baryon asymmetry and cosmic inflation, adopting the principle of minimal particle content and the most general renormalizable Lagrangian. We base the model purely on empirical facts rather than aesthetics. We need only six new degrees of freedom beyond the MSM. It is free from excessive flavor-changing effects, CP violation, too-rapid proton decay, problems with electroweak precision data, and unwanted cosmological relics. Any model of physics beyond the MSM should be measured against the phenomenological success of this model. https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-ph/0405097 Brent It must be reeeal easy to calculate a probability applying Born's rule to that wf. AG -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/24657d76-e53e-4333-b946-1b7baeca2a46n%40googlegroups.com.
