On 2/25/2025 5:09 PM, Russell Standish wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 11:01:11AM +1100, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 2/24/2025 6:09 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
Your claim that "one observer per branch" follows directly from unitary
evolution is an assumption, not a derivation.
No, it is a straightforward derivation from the formalism. If you don't
understand that, it is just further confirmation of the fact that you
understand very little about quantum mechanics.
Not at all - it is an assumption you're making, and the nub of the entire
argument between you and Quentin.
Do you understand Quentin's theory? ISTM it's just "Observer counting"
where the counts instantiate the Born rule ex hypothesi. It's branch
counting by another name.
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/ff669777-b532-4b09-a442-b9c6d672d9e5%40gmail.com.
