On Sunday, March 9, 2025 at 6:02:22 AM UTC-6 John Clark wrote:

On Sun, Mar 9, 2025 at 12:51 AM Alan Grayson <agrays...@gmail.com> wrote:

*>>>> Recent events have proven that computer scientists have figured out 
the relationship between mind and matter well enough to be able to turn 
inert matter into a mind. Meanwhile Hindu gurus and Yoga adepts are doing 
the exact same thing they've been doing for thousands of years, 
contemplating their navels and making zero progress on understanding how 
the world works. *


*>>> Contemplating one's navel is hugely harder to do than you think.*


*>>Playing the piano with your feet, even if it's only done very poorly, is 
also extremely difficult, however like navel gazing it will not help you 
one bit in understanding how the world works.  *


*> How would you know without trying to navel gaze**,*


*Everybody engages in woolgathering, a.k.a. navel gazing, from time to 
time, but the more time you spend on that the less time you can spend on 
figuring out how the world works. That's why yogis and gurus are preaching 
exactly the same stuff they were preaching a thousand years ago, they have 
found nothing new so they have nothing new to say.    *

* > **Since you can't *define [it]


*As I have said before, I have something far far better than a definition, 
I have examples. And for me the most important example of consciousness is 
me.  *

*> and more important you don't know how it comes to exist, *



*Thanks to very recent developments I now know of two ways consciousness 
can come to exist:1) Through random mutation and natural selection, which 
produces intelligence, which produces consciousness, although that process 
is very slow. *

*2) Consciousness can also be achieved through the administrations of 
computer scientists, but unlike Evolution this way is exponentially fast. *

*> you can't assert a black box has it. *


*Am I allowed to assert that one of my fellow human beings, yourself for 
example, is conscious, at least when you're not sleeping or under 
anesthesia or dead? If your answer is yes then why isn't that the same 
answer for a black box that behaves the same way? Is it really of 
fundamental cosmic importance that one of you has a brain that is wet and 
squishy while the other has a brain that is dry and hard?  *
 
*  John K Clark    See what's on my new list at  Extropolis 
<https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis>* 


You're hopelessly deluded. You live a life in mundane ignorance, You have 
no chance to grasp the reality discovered by yogis and gurus. AG

aia, 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/5de1ebdb-9b4a-4b29-b61f-48810b2497can%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to