On Tuesday, March 11, 2025 at 12:48:31 AM UTC-6 Alan Grayson wrote:

On Tuesday, March 11, 2025 at 12:33:36 AM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:

On 3/10/2025 11:04 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:

    On Monday, March 10, 2025 at 11:15:07 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:

          On 3/9/2025 11:14 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:

I don't think you understand my question. Without a CC, or equivalently 
setting it to zero, don't we get a universe which is in UNSTABLE 
equilibrium, like balancing a pencil of its writing tip, so the universe 
expands or contracts in a very short time interval? Isn't this the issue 
Einstein faced? If so, why would he choose a positive CC? AG 


No, Einstein's model with the CC=0 was static.  The model when I was in 
grad school was an expanding universe with the CC=0 but the expansion 
kinetic energy was just balanced by the negative gravitational potential, 
so the universe would expand forever but slowing asymptotically toward 
static.

Brent


Now I am totally confused. If E's model was static with CC=0, 

Sorry, I miswrote.  I intended to say Einstein had to make the CC>0 in 
order to balance the gravitational attraction.

Brent


OK. Does setting CC>0 result in unstable equilibrium as I think Clark 
claimed, and discovered by Arthur Eddington?  IOW, will the universe 
suddenly contract if it is expanding? AG


Maybe Clark meant that setting CC>0 results in a static universe, which is 
in unstable equilibrium, meaning that it will suddenly expand or contract? 
AG 

it agreed with what astronomers thought in 1915, so why would he add a 
positive CC, tantamount to a repulsive force as you earlier claimed, to 
counteract what he then thought was a false prediction of GR of an 
expanding universe? Does anyone have a coherent answer to what's going on 
with the CC? AG

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/59c33354-37c2-4d47-8036-a5d8c9159dden%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to