On 3/10/2025 11:48 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:


On Tuesday, March 11, 2025 at 12:33:36 AM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:



    On 3/10/2025 11:04 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:


    On Monday, March 10, 2025 at 11:15:07 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:



        On 3/9/2025 11:14 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
        I don't think you understand my question. Without a CC, or
        equivalently setting it to zero, don't we get a universe
        which is in UNSTABLE equilibrium, like balancing a pencil of
        its writing tip, so the universe expands or contracts in a
        very short time interval? Isn't this the issue Einstein
faced? If so, why would he choose a positive CC? AG

        No, Einstein's model with the CC=0 was static. The model when
        I was in grad school was an expanding universe with the CC=0
        but the expansion kinetic energy was just balanced by the
        negative gravitational potential, so the universe would
        expand forever but slowing asymptotically toward static.

        Brent


    Now I am totally confused. If E's model was static with CC=0,
    Sorry, I miswrote.  I intended to say Einstein had to make the
    CC>0 in order to balance the gravitational attraction.

    Brent


OK. Does setting CC>0 result in unstable equilibrium as I think Clark claimed, and discovered by Arthur Eddington? IOW, will the universe suddenly contract if it is expanding? AG
No, it's unstable as a static universe, which was the general opinion of astronomers at the time.  The Milky Way was the only known galaxy.  The other smudges in the night sky were "nebula".  So Einstein calculated a value for the CC that would just balance the gravitational attraction of the Milky Way, to explain why it hadn't collapsed.  But this produced an unstable equilbrium.  It was about 10yrs later that Hubble discovered the universe was much bigger than just the Milky Way and it was expanding.

Brent

    it agreed with what astronomers thought in 1915, so why would he
    add a positive CC, tantamount to a repulsive force as you earlier
    claimed, to counteract what he then thought was a false
    prediction of GR of an expanding universe? Does anyone have a
    coherent answer to what's going on with the CC? AG
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the
    Google Groups "Everything List" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
    send an email to everything-li...@googlegroups.com.
    To view this discussion visit
    
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/a012aae4-1174-46c6-998c-c08aaca0e952n%40googlegroups.com
    
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/a012aae4-1174-46c6-998c-c08aaca0e952n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/21d2fa87-e491-46e1-ba99-2a0cfed645een%40googlegroups.com <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/21d2fa87-e491-46e1-ba99-2a0cfed645een%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/e5571496-6240-4317-9ce9-fb51ee33c7bf%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to