|
I vote for Mixel’s idea. It has the additional benefit of ensuring some discussion between folk on the books requested, which means that one benefits from ‘interpretative’ aspects of ‘the other’, and not just from a subjective ‘private’ read. It also builds friendships and collaborative possibilities. And I certainly do not feel comfortable digging around in CLEA’s basement!
However, to facilitate co-ordonation and housing of books, we still need to find a *neutral* place where they can live. Given the fight for ‘space’ in CLEA, ECCO could temporarily benefit from another library ‘place’, as CLEA would definitely be ‘uncomfortable’.
A suggestion for discussion: It appears that I will be reassigned to a new office in C building which because of voice-dictation I shall have to my self (am I blessed or what?). I am happy to suggest that I leave a spare key with out secretary with a list of people who belong to ECCO, and if I am not there, or it is outside of the strange hours I generally keep, perhaps they could respectfully browse the library in there as it seems that there will be space. There should be no problem with security for example, as anything I own of value (????) would be in my filing cabinet anyway. If anyone has any other idea along these lines perhaps it should be examined?
I have Dan Dennett’s Freedom Evolves (on its way from Canada), but suggest that what we begin to do is move away from the more ‘popular science’ versions of the subjects of common interest (not that Dennett’s book is exactly non-academic), and that we start getting into the meat of some of these issues. (Apologies if they are needed …?). I really think we should be striving for rigour, and whilst most subjects are often approached through ‘softer’ versions of the subject initially (a necessary step), ramping-up our expectations would be a good thing. Of course I speak for myself, intellectually, too.
I would like the online data base to have information that includes the academic papers touching in some significant way on these subjects (selected by ourselves and the next-neighbourhood of colleagues), and papers which critique the ideas in the book. I see no reason why the digital database should not commence immediately. Why wait? We will all just get busier and busier, so now is as good a time as any.
Margeret
" ... capacities that belong to spontaneity are in play in actualizations of receptivity.." (Mc Dowell, Mind and World)
-----Original Message-----
On 29-sep-04, at 13:18, Francis Heylighen wrote:
Francis
Heylighen --- --- --- --- |
- RE: [ECCO] Choosing interesting books for ECCO Klaas Chielens
- RE: [ECCO] Choosing interesting books for ECCO Francis Heylighen
- Re: [ECCO] Choosing interesting books for ECCO Mixel Kiemen
- [ECCO] Creating an ECCO database margeret heath
- [ECCO] Creating an ECCO database Francis Heylighen
- Re: [ECCO] Creating an ECCO databa... Carlos Gershenson
- RE: [ECCO] Creating an ECCO da... Klaas Chielens
- Re: [ECCO] Creating an ECC... Mixel Kiemen
- RE: [ECCO] Creating an ECC... margeret heath
- Re[2]: [ECCO] Creating an ... Carlos Gershenson
- Re: [ECCO] Creating an ECCO databa... Mixel Kiemen
- Re: [ECCO] Choosing interesting books for ECCO Carlos Gershenson
