2007/5/31, Matthew Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 07:58 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: > > What version to start with? I'm on Debian GNU/Linux, which currently has > > evo > > 2.6. I notice that's a bit dated (although I did see that a few months ago > > some of the Debian packagers were interested in making a more recent > > version). I've been working from the Debian version. Does that version, > > the > > last stable release (from evo, not Debian), or svn head make the most sense > > to work from? (BTW, the one bug I fixed was one that was already fixed > > post-2.6). > > FYI, Debian Unstable has Evolution 2.10. Might be easier to grab at > least the 2.10 dependencies from there. You'll need to upgrade gtkhtml > and likely also your GTK+ library stack to get 2.10 to build.
In case you're on a Debian-based distribution and not pulling from svn, I would recommend using pre-built packages, or even building the packages yourself. 2.10.2 is in the archive, and I will do 2.11.2 this weekend. For my own development setup I use the 2.10.x packages plus custom build from svn for the module I'm hacking on. e-d-s for example, I install to /opt/evolution-data-server. Then I can start development e-d-s with 'LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/evolution-data-server/lib /opt/evolution-data-server/libexec/evolution-data-server-1.12' and can also start the stable e-d-s with '/usr/lib/evolution/evolution-data-server-1.10' Cheers, Øystein _______________________________________________ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolutionemail@example.com http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers