Tor, It may not work out here, since the micro version is what we bump during release which is in sync with the GNOME Release micro version. (Evolution 2.21.3 == GNOME 2.21.3)
Matt, I'm not against it, if it benefits hackers. Personally I don't use 2 versions and so It doesn't matter much to me. If I don't hear any objections, I would be doing it during the 2.21.4 release and make trunk 2.21.5. -Srini. On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 03:29 +0200, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > > I notice we've been doing pre-release version incrementing > > [...] > > I was wondering if the team would be open to switching to post-release > > version incrementing > > May I suggest a third, in my opinion superior, way: Both. > > That's what cairo uses, see > http://cairographics.org/manual/cairo-Version-Information.html . The > micro version number is even in released tarballs, and odd > inbetween. The even number never exists in SVN. The micro number is > bumped by the person doing a release, and then bumped again and > committed after the tarball has been built. Thus there cannot be any > confusion between official released versions and builds from SVN at > least as far as version numbers are concerned. > > --tml > > _______________________________________________ > Evolution-hackers mailing list > Evolution-hackers@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers _______________________________________________ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
