Sorry for the noise, I just saw the bug created by you. Just clearing my mails in a jetlag.
-Srini. On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 14:22 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: > I think, it qualifies to be a bug in bugzilla. (donno if one is there > already) > > -Srini. > > On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 14:38 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > When you add an image to your HTML signature, it'll make the > > content-disposition "attachment" and it'll set the filename header. > > > > Both actions are incorrect: the content-disposition is inline and > > there's no need to set the filename header. Both will make E-mail > > clients like Outlook, but also Evolution itself, think that the E-mail > > contains an attachment (a file attachment). > > > > I have seen Evolution do this wrong for all kinds of inline embedded > > images, whenever you insert this into your HTML document. This is > > incorrect behaviour and not conform MIME. > > > > ps. For a free software E-mail client, I think the better option is to > > go with the specifications. That Outlook gets things wrong is not a good > > excuse. Although I think modern E-mail clients like Outlook are getting > > this right nowadays. > > > > _______________________________________________ Evolution-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
