Did you try your patch with any really long file names? Jeff
On Thu, 2008-05-22 at 04:17 -0400, Michael B. Trausch wrote: > On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 20:24 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > > Fudging the linked list in camel is a gross hack (made worse by the > > fact that the MIME specification does not dictate that the name param > > be last), this is why I suggested you do it in the composer by making > > it set the name parameter last when constructing the headers. > > My intention was simply to have the most potential code benefit from the > patch, as opposed to localizing a fix in a client of the library. The > real benefit to the patch is that it will prevent users from assuming > (rationally, even though incorrectly) that there is a problem with > _their_ client, since other clients happen to work. > > I would love to just see the right thing get fixed here; that would of > course be the ideal solution. However, most users wouldn't be able to > fix this issue, and they'd give up and go back to what they know---that > which they *perceive* to be functional. Of course, if it's fixed in > just the composer, that gets around the immediate issue, but what > happens if some other piece of code uses EDS to build a message to be > sent to a buggy server? Am I missing something? > > Thanks, > Mike > _______________________________________________ Evolution-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
