On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 01:38 -0500, Hans Petter Jansson wrote: > On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 13:31 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: > > > > Wouldn't it be possible to use a different directory, e.g. > > > "mail/local-index/folders.db"? That would avoid both problems. > > > You end up seeing a new folder local-index in 2.22/older and a > > folders.db folder under it. :( > > Wouldn't that just happen if you had > "mail/local/local-index/folders.db"? I was hoping you could place > local-index or something equivalent outside the mail/local/ hierarchy > entirely - either directly under "~/.evolution/mail/" or, as Ross > suggested, in "~/.cache/evolution/" (I like the latter a lot).
I'm just trying out a new model, like a single-db for entire evolution-accounts-folders, instead of db-per-accounts/table-per-folder, which forces this. In the new model, ~/.evolution/mail/summary.db could be for entire Evolution. Vfolders would be even more faster, being single table. Anyways, just exploring. Would share when I have things in better shape. -Srini _______________________________________________ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolutionfirstname.lastname@example.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers