On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 01:38 -0500, Hans Petter Jansson wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 13:31 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
> > > Wouldn't it be possible to use a different directory, e.g.
> > > "mail/local-index/folders.db"? That would avoid both problems.
> > You end up seeing a new folder local-index in 2.22/older and a
> > folders.db folder under it. :(
> Wouldn't that just happen if you had
> "mail/local/local-index/folders.db"? I was hoping you could place
> local-index or something equivalent outside the mail/local/ hierarchy
> entirely - either directly under "~/.evolution/mail/" or, as Ross
> suggested, in "~/.cache/evolution/" (I like the latter a lot).

I'm just trying out a new model, like a single-db for entire
evolution-accounts-folders, instead of db-per-accounts/table-per-folder,
which forces this. In the new model, ~/.evolution/mail/summary.db could
be for entire Evolution. Vfolders would be even more faster, being
single table. Anyways, just exploring. Would share when I have things in
better shape.

Evolution-hackers mailing list

Reply via email to