On Sat, 2009-09-26 at 11:37 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: > On Sat, 2009-09-26 at 15:21 +0200, Butrus Damaskus wrote: > > New version of iCalendar was accepted as RFC 5545 (see eg. > > http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5545.txt). Does this mean something > > for evolution development? :-o > > Looks like it's basically just errata from RFC 2445 (see page 166). I'm > sure the corrections can be implemented or verified pretty easily. The > burden may fall on the Free Association project as much as if not more > so than on us.
Wondering why it is an entirely new RFC for a bunch (11 to be precise) of errata. It could easily have been RFC 2445 spec 2 or something similar. -Suman _______________________________________________ Evolution-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
