On Sat, 2009-09-26 at 11:37 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-09-26 at 15:21 +0200, Butrus Damaskus wrote:
> > New version of iCalendar was accepted as RFC 5545 (see eg.
> > http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5545.txt). Does this mean something
> > for evolution development? :-o
> 
> Looks like it's basically just errata from RFC 2445 (see page 166).  I'm
> sure the corrections can be implemented or verified pretty easily.  The
> burden may fall on the Free Association project as much as if not more
> so than on us.

Wondering why it is an entirely new RFC for a bunch (11 to be precise)
of errata. It could easily have been RFC 2445 spec 2 or something
similar. 

-Suman

_______________________________________________
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers

Reply via email to