Dunno if this exchange is appropriate in this list(I’m a n00b), however, in my experience evolution-exchange will work fine with 2003. Things don’t start getting sketchy until Exchange 2007, and there if you want full function you must use exchange-mapi, which is very sketchy indeed ( or at least the version I’m using – 2.30 ). I’m currently trying (with very, well, 0 success) to build a dev checkout of Evolution (2.91.4) and am having no end of troubles.. So: evo-exchange works fine w/ 2003, evo-mapi works (not really) with 2007, and imap will work with both if you don’t need full functionality (things like calendar synching etc.)
Peace, V From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Herbert Stiftler Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 2:24 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [Evolution-hackers] ExchangeServer 2003: MAPI or Exchange? Hi, in my company we use an Exchange server 2003. As I'm planning to switching to ubuntu, I'm interested in using evolution for email. As i see, there are two options to connect to exchange server: evolution-mapi and evolution-exchange - What are the differences between them? - Which one is more stable? - Which one is more complete? - Which one you would suggest to use? Thank you, Herbert
_______________________________________________ evolution-hackers mailing list [email protected] To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
