On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 07:43 -0600, Matthew Barnes wrote: > Seems fine to me, as long as we continue to target the last stable > version as the source to migrate from.
Does it mean that the migration routines should be clever enough to know whether they were running already, though the version will indicate they didn't? I would use the last version in the migration code check, and if any fix in the migration routine would be done after another release, then just increase the number in the version check. It might work as long as the changes will be done non-destructively. On the other hand, if you think the little breakage is acceptable in development releases, then this might not worth the trouble. Maybe. Bye, Milan _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers mailing list email@example.com To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers