On Fri, 2013-07-26 at 07:38 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: > > * I think our policy toward stable branch maintenance could be a little > more relaxed during the first half of a release cycle in terms of what > we allow in. I don't know what that means exactly for us yet, but I > have observed RHEL updates do sometimes include new features. Maybe > enterprise policies could be a rough guide until we find our footing.
Well, you lot haven't *actually* shouted at me very much for some of the stuff I've added in stable branches. I get more pushback from the translators if I have to add new strings, than I did for the whole of the mspack and GAL rework which landed in 3.8 for example. I'm happy enough with that :) -- David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre david.woodho...@intel.com Intel Corporation
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
