On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 01:26 +0200, Tobias Mueller wrote: > Hm. I'm wondering whether this is a problem for the rest of GNOME, too. > Do the arguments brought up in this thread apply to Evolution (and > friends) only? If no: Would the rest of GNOME also benefit from a > different release schedule? If yes: Why would that be? The arguments on > favour of a longer cycle seem to be very generic to me.
It's difficult to speak to GNOME as a whole because -- GNOME OS visions notwithstanding -- GNOME is a diverse collection of independent projects of different sizes, levels of maturity, "activeness" and agendas. Different projects of different sizes have different needs. I'd caution against generalizing from one example. The arguments brought up here may not be unique to Evolution, but they're based on observations of how well Evolution development policies are serving the Evolution community. Matt _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers mailing list [email protected] To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
