On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 17:21 +0400, Emre Erenoglu wrote: > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Fabiano FidĂȘncio > <fabi...@fidencio.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Emre Erenoglu > <ereno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 1) Enhancement of search bar with expression search > ability, such as: > from:emre to:evolution subject:search or shortly > f:emre t:evolution s:search > > It could be done within the notmuch idea, no? > > I don't know about the notmuch, but if you say so, then OK :)
Hi, I think having the notmuch as a GSoC project is a good idea, as it involves work for couple weeks. Fidencio has it in his list already, thus the short-search might be gained for free. > 2) Attachment Detach and Link function This one, from my point of view, doesn't qualify for a GSoC project, basically because it's "only" a serialization of two actions, which might not make anybody busy for couple weeks. Also, as Andre mentioned on the evolution-list, those "detached" attachments might not be available, if you move to other machine (supposing you'll move the attachment on a remote protocol, like IMAP, Exchange related, and so on), thus the link to it will be relevant only on one machine, and only until user actually deletes the file (or even better until overwrites it with a content from other attachment, which may then just confuse him/her, even unintentionally and being done by the user him/her-self). It doesn't mean that it cannot live as a bug request, for someone whom would like to play a bit with the code, it's just that it's too simple for a GSoC project, from my point of view. Bye, Milan _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers