On Tue, 2018-01-02 at 13:45 +0100, Milan Crha wrote: > thus there's a problem with interoperability (at the moment) > and basically no use for it in corporate environments (read: with > Outlook users), thus definitely no high priority for me. Once you > have > a feature request filled you can also convince someone to work on it > and provide patches.
This is off-topic slightly, but isn't letting outlook define the feature set of evolution like letting IE 6 define the features of firefox? I understand the business case for the prioritisation. But policy wise, shouldn't the Free Software world also want to make features that aren't interoperable, but in a way that invites proprietary email clients to support them. (i.e. documenting them in a project neutral space and making sure it's using as much existing tech as possible) Best Regards, Martin Owens _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers mailing list [email protected] To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
