On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 16:19, Ettore Perazzoli wrote: > Now the possible issues: > > * In the case of IMAP mail, when would the spam value get > measured? We have to download the message before we decide > whether it's spam or not. I guess if we make Evolution download > all messages by default in the background for offline then we > can just hook the spam detection to that. (But if the user > turns that off, then detection wouldn't happen until she opens > the message.)
I believe in Mail.app this is actually an option, although I don't remember if it's global or per-store. You can choose to download headers, data, or data and attachments IIRC. It warns you that spam filtering isn't available if you do headers-only, but it then does it when the message is opened. > * We would probably want it to automatically recognize messages > that went through a spam filter in the server already. I.e. > Evolution could recognize the X-Spam headers and turn the "this > is spam" bit on automatically when appropriate? I think this is a very good idea. > * Should the "Junk" folder be implemented as a vfolder, like the > Trash? Then messages wouldn't actually move back and forth > between folders, and if there is a false positive the user > marking the message as "not spam" would automatically result in > the message disappearing from the vfolder and appearing in its > original folder. It would maintain ordering in the original folder, which is nice for false positives. Joe _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
