On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 07:35, Christopher Ness wrote: > Wow, it's early and I haven't had a coffee yet, why am I replying??... > > On Sun, 2003-08-10 at 23:47, Rodney Dawes wrote: > > On Sun, 2003-08-10 at 16:22, Christopher Ness wrote: > > > On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 17:48, Not Zed wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 16:19, Ettore Perazzoli wrote: > > <snip /> > > > > Your above statement leads me to believe that Spamasassin is going to > > > become a dependency for Evo, is this your intention? > > > > If the spam filter integration stuff gets implemented for 2.0, the Evo > > packages will depend upon Spamassassin in some manner. If we get a > > plug-in framework going, beyond the bonobo cruft that we need to work > > around already, then whatever plug-in for the spam filtering will depend > > on Spamassassin (as well as be part of the default install). The way > > What should the default be? Do you plan to install this pluggin by > default or will the user have to install the package to get this > feature? > > Why Spamassassin? Is it because it will be easier to support for the > masses? Should it not be possible to allow any filter to be used?
Michael Zucchi and I want to make it so that it can be made to use any filter program - whether it be SpamAssassin, Bogofilter, etc... Jeff -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
