At 08 August, 2003 Ettore Perazzoli wrote: > I think we need to have some built-in anti-spam functionality in Evo > 2.0.
Yes! I can hardly use any mailer without this feature this days. I have configured filter for evolution but it is a suboptimal workaround. > For the actual spam detection, I think we should just use Spamassassin. > It works great, is actively maintained, and is very simple to interface > to. It also does a great job without any training, although it does > support Bayesan filtering. I don't think spamassasin is the best solution. It is slow and I don't think it "just works". When I used spamassasin with evoluiton a lot of spam got passed the filter. I then tried bogofilter which is just a bayesian filter and got better results when I had fed it the same ammount of mails as I did with spam assasin. It is also faster then spamassasin since it is just a bayesian filter. I hope you make the solution pluggable, that way people who like spamassasin might use that and I can have it my way. //Snaggen, likes bogofilter better than spamassasin _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
