I'm wondering if maybe fork()/exec()ing spamc isn't the right way to do this for evolution. I'm thinking that if we just communicate with spamd directly, we might get better than 3/4s per mesg speeds. I'm just not happy with the current performance that this spam-check code gets :\
thoughts? Jeff _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
