On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 10:33 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > I'm wondering if maybe fork()/exec()ing spamc isn't the right way to do > this for evolution. I'm thinking that if we just communicate with spamd > directly, we might get better than 3/4s per mesg speeds. I'm just not > happy with the current performance that this spam-check code gets :\
yeah, that seems doable, I was thinking about it and spamc source code looks pretty simple. I didn't look at licensing yet though. but we may rewrite spamc source code if needed I guess. cheers Radek _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
