On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 11:48 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > Does this break NNTP subscription stuff?
No; it's entirely within the IMAP provider. The generic code always asks for only subscribed folders, if the store admits to being able to understand subscriptions. The way the IMAP provider implements 'show all folders' is to pretend it _doesn't_ grok the concept of subscriptions. I did comment on IRC that I suspect it'd be nicer if we could change this; moving the 'show all or only subscribed folders' option out of the imap-private config, and possible also the choice of which folders to check for new mail. I didn't do that though. > anyways, I don't know about NotZed but I think a better approach would > be to allow specifying which folders to automatically check for new mail > rather than the kludge you've done. I very much prefer using the subscribed folder list for this, since the server maintains that and when new folders are added (or become active) it doesn't need to be changed in all clients. Besides, there's not another sane meaning for subscription, in the 'show all folders' case. -- dwmw2 _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
