On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 09:37, David Woodhouse wrote: [snip] > > In the case where we _don't_ take subscription to mean that a folder > should be visible, I cannot comprehend any _other_ meaning for 'active' > folders other than that they are the ones which receive new mail. Can > you?
What if I want to show only subscribed folders but only want evo to check a subset of those subscribed folders? > > It seems to make sense. it's a hack. > > I would settle for a way to specifically identify folders to be checks, > as either you or NotZed suggested -- but using the list of subscribed > folders, or at least _optionally_ doing so, seems to make a lot more > sense. If you want to make it so that evo can be set to only check a subset of folders for new mail, I'd rather see a way to pick folders independent of subscription status. Jeff -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
