On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 00:22, JP Rosevear wrote: > On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 01:40, Hans Petter Jansson wrote: > > On Sun, 2004-01-18 at 21:10, JP Rosevear wrote: > > > Basically the UI for showing/hiding calendar sources and selecting a > > > primary source sucks pretty bad. It allows inconsistencies in the UI. > > > I've been playing around with this a bit and keep coming up with two > > > issues: > > > > > > 1. Does it make sense to allow a "primary" calendar (the one > > > highlighted) to not be checked (shown in the view to the right). What > > > does Apple's Ical do? > > > > I think it should be ok for it to not be checked, but we can treat it as > > if it was, as long as it's highlighted. I think this is what the user > > expects when he highlights it. If we check a source when it gets > > highlighted, you'll end up with most of your sources checked most of the > > time, which can be annoying. > > The main issue I see with this is that you will create meetings that > will disappear the moment you finish creating them (unless "primary" > implies both displayed and default, which is a little inconsistent).
What I meant was primary == always shown. Without changing the state of the checkmarks. -- Hans Petter _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
