On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 09:00, Tuomas Kuosmanen wrote: > On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 11:21, Rodrigo Moya wrote: > > On Sun, 2004-01-18 at 22:10 -0500, JP Rosevear wrote: > > > Basically the UI for showing/hiding calendar sources and selecting a > > > primary source sucks pretty bad. It allows inconsistencies in the UI. > > > I've been playing around with this a bit and keep coming up with two > > > issues: > > > > > > 1. Does it make sense to allow a "primary" calendar (the one > > > highlighted) to not be checked (shown in the view to the right). What > > > does Apple's Ical do? > > > > > hmm, good question, since that primary calendar will be used as the > > default for a lot of operations, while not being selected, which could > > make the user think her new appointment wasn't saved, since it wont show > > up in the calendar views. > > I think this makes sense. I'll check what ical does in a moment, but I > think it is good that there is always at least one calendar visible. I > mean, it is possible that it is the only calendar even, so hiding it > is kind of silly.
I'm unclear - what part makes sense? -JP -- JP Rosevear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ximian, Inc. _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
