On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 20:05 +0530, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote: > hi All, > > During the irc meeting last week, we discussed the pros and cons of > deprecating evolution-patches and using bugzilla as the treasure > bag for patches. > > > A quick recap of the main points in favor of Bugzilla - > * we tend to 'lose' patches in e-p. Bugzilla is more sticky. > * easier for downstream packagers to release updates. > * b.g.o can be queried for un/reviewed patches. > > the other side of the coin : > * bgo is much slower than reading mails > * you need to be on-line to pull down the patches. > > Fresh thoughts, any ?
Yes. The ideal way might be to use bugzilla for patches and see if we could get automated mails to e-p containing the bug number, product, component and summary (and a link) if a patch is attachment is set on a bug. -JP -- JP Rosevear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Novell, Inc. _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
