Attachments are often broken in mailing list archives, so this is pretty unreliable for getting at the patches. Attaching them in bugzilla is much better for archiving the patches.
-- dobey On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 15:34 +0530, Sarfraaz Ahmed wrote: > > So, since the main reason for having patches in bugzilla is for > > packagers to have an easier way to release updates, I'd suggest using > > e-p and always attaching the bugs to bugzilla. That should work for > > people preferring bugzilla querying. > > Hmm, how about always using e-p and giving links in bugzilla to the > patches mail in e-p archives ? We could always add the "patch" keyword > in bugzilla anyway. So, once we have a patch, we send it to e-p for > review and add a link of that mail in bugzilla. [ This link would also > help in browsing through all the replies to that patch. ]. But, may be > we need to make it mandatory that all patches for a given bug submitted > to e-p, should have its link added on in bugzilla, so that no patch is > left out. > > --Sarfraaz _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
