We already have something like this called GtkDoc - and the inline comments in Camel already contain comments in the correct format in order to be extracted by the tool, but someone has to go and setup the makefiles to do it.
Jeff On Fri, 2002-06-14 at 16:50, A. Lloyd Flanagan wrote: > I'd like to suggest that for the future we might want to use a tool like > javadoc. This would allow the documentation for the classes/functions > to be included in the source code and automatically extracted to HTML. > This is a great way to the basic documentation for the classes, although > you still have to do overviews, how-tos, etc. > A tool that does javadoc-like doc generation for C++ is CCDoc, found at > http://www.joelinoff.com/ccdoc/. I don't know of a tool for C/Cobra > code, although it shouldn't be too hard to do one. > > > On Thu, 2002-06-13 at 23:47, Joe Khoobyar wrote: > . > . > . > However, I was wondering if there was any documentation lying around > about the class hierarchy in Evolution? I figured if there was, it > would save me a lot of time tooling around to figure out the basic > structure of things. Unfortunately, free time is something that can be > pretty elusive. > > > _______________________________________________ > evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers > > > > > _______________________________________________ > evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers -- Jeffrey Stedfast <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ximian, Inc. _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
