On Mon, 2002-09-23 at 10:49, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > On Sun, 2002-09-22 at 21:15, Colin Walters wrote: > > On Sat, 2002-09-21 at 06:51, Not Zed wrote: > > > > > I would think we will not be making a branch till at least the 1.2 final > > > release, and probably not till a while after that. To reduce the amount > > > of management required to maintain the branches. > > > > Hmm. Well, I guess I can understand not branching until the 1.2 > > release, but not setting up a branch afterwards doesn't make sense to > > me. I mean, you're going to need one to start on the GNOME 2 port. > > We're just going to use HEAD for the GNOME2 port. And what NotZed means > is that we will probably have last-minute bugs to fix after a 1.2.0 > release (we did with 1.0) and so therefor won't necessarily both > branching immediately to start on a GNOME2 port (since we won't be > working on it anyway).
Yeah thats what i meant. We dont need it till we start on gnome2 port. > > > Also note, the next development phase i believe will be devoted to > > > porting to the gnome 2 platform, and not feature enhancement. :-/ > > > > Well, my patches aren't generally intrusive, and they wouldn't affect > > things that will likely change a lot during the GNOME 2 port. And if I > > can start putting stuff in, I'll be a lot more motivated to help out > > with the GNOME 2 porting, too... > > No new features means no new features. Yeah. Sorry Colin, we're not doing this to piss you off ... It would be my hope that the gnome 2 porting stage would be as quick as possible - and no new features would help this. Then we can get back to the meat of scratching out the next versions' feature set. _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
