On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 14:54 +0530, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-02-25 at 18:17 -0600, Peter Van Lone wrote:
> > On 2/16/07, Per Nystrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > There are a lot of variables not accounted for here, but the dropoff in
> > > closure rate after 2.6.0 is still pretty dramatic.
> >
> > I find that pretty amazing. The connector project has the "feel" of
> > not being high priority, and this just validates it.
> >
> > Damn ... damn ...
>
> The Exchange Connector has made larger strides in the last few months
> than it had ever done in the previous couple of years but I must admit
> this progress is not very evident on the upstream bugzilla.
> Some of the biggest user delights include improved GAL caching, improved
> support for Public (subscribed folders) and giant leaps in performance
> etc.
>
> I guess the evolution-exchange maintainer is in a better position to
> highlight the milestones we have crossed.
>
Thanks, Harish, for the lead - Yes, 2.10 will boast a huge improvement
in terms of performance than its predecessors.
2.10 has:
+ greatly improved GAL caching,
+ the most wanted public folders (with subfolders) support with much
much improved performance
+ improved calendar support
+ improved initial loading of mails
Things that are being worked upon
+ 2007 support
+ Connectivity issues/crashers.
Thanks,
V. Varadhan
--
Veerapuram Varadhan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_______________________________________________
Evolution-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
