On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 08:29 -0600, Peter Van Lone wrote: > On 2/26/07, Per Nystrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I like a lot of the changes to evo that I've seen in 2.8.3. I might > > even try to run 2.9.x if I can find SRPMs that compile on my box before > > resorting to a downgrade. But the bottom line is I need to be able to > > do my day-to-day work also, and the problem I'm having in 2.8.3 is > > killing my productivity. > > > [snip...] > Obviously I need to learn how to do that ... but just as obviously (to > me, anyway) the maintainers of the SLED distro need to keep evo > (especially as it is so broken) much more up to date. > Evolution is up-to-date in SLED 10 SP1 branch, that is currently being worked upon. In the upcoming Brainshare (http://www.novell.com/brainshare), Novell is releasing the first public Beta of SLED10 SP1, which has got more updates/fixes.
> I have recently gotten a couple of test installations up and running, > and will (when I can find some time for it) start to play around with > compiling the 2.9.x series on SLED, to see if it can work. > It works - but, needs compilation of 56 other dependent modules as well. I am running SLED10 SP1 Beta and SVN evolution (compiled from source). V. Varadhan -- Veerapuram Varadhan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Evolution-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
