On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Paul Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > First, this comes up every so often so it's worth it to look for > previous threads. Second, your assertion that "most other email lists > of this type" use reply-to-list is not correct; in fact as far as I > recall I don't belong to a single mailing list that uses reply-to-list > (and I belong to a LOT of mailing lists). >
Interesting - I don't actually belong to too many email discussion lists, all them are technical, like this one, and all the others (CentOS, GNOME, rpmforge, OOo) use the reply-to-all as the default. On the other hand, I belong to several hundred discussion groups (mostly Yahoo groups) and almost all of them are set up for reply-to-all, with the exceptions being the newletter-type groups (reply-to-moderator). > Nope, it's a PITA to you and some others, but it's absolutely the > preferred behavior for me and some others on this list. And, probably, > there are some who don't care one way or the other :-). > Okay, point well taken. I suppose it's a matter of habit - I usually use "Reply" rather than "Reply-to-All" and have become accustomed to it. Six of one.... > FYI: http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html > Interesting bit of history there. Thanks. mhr _______________________________________________ Evolution-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
