El mié, 23-01-2013 a las 07:38 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams escribió: > On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 09:39 -0200, Lailah wrote: > > El mar, 22-01-2013 a las 21:42 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams escribió: > > > On Tue, 2013-01-22 at 11:27 -0600, JC wrote: > > > POP and IMAP are separate accounts. And IMAP account is a persistent > > > thing while POP is really just a local mailbox to which mail is > > > downloaded. Just create an IMAP account and then you can drag the mail > > > from the POP account into the IMAP account. Then just delete the POP > > > account. > > POP is a dead legacy etc. is just an opinion. > > Nope, it is true. IMAP does everything POP does, just more. You track > seen-state, messages can [optionally] be partially retrieved saving > enormous amounts of bandwidth, etc... allow moving messages between > folders [IMAP allows folders in the first place]. All the devices can > track the same message state. > > > _______________________________________________
That is true. What is not true is saying IMAP is better or POP is better as a fact. IMAP suits better in your way to do things, POP suits better in mine. That's all. I don't know if I'm explaining very well... I'm a Spanish speaker. Cheers, Lailah
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list [email protected] To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
