________________________________
From: N B Day <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Friday, 23 August 2013, 20:19
Subject: Re: [Evolution] downloads page


On Fri, 2013-08-23 at 15:30 -0300, BAPR wrote:

<snip />

> Ubuntu is presently shipping with evolution 3.6.4-0ubuntu1
> 
<snip />

Are you sure about this?  Evolution is no longer the *default* MUA in
Ubuntu, but reasonably up-to-date versions continue to be offered in the
repositories.  I'm not on Saucy now, but I'm sure that offers evo 3.8.x.
Saucy (13.10, to be released in mid-October) still uses the evolution
calendaring functions for their version of the GNOME calendar too.

> Tom's suggestion of providing a link for Ubuntu (and other) users has
> merit
> 

In the (IMO) very unlikely event that Ubuntu drops evolution entirely
there will certainly be people on the outside packaging it and offering
it in PPAs.  


<snip />


Hi :)  
In other projects i have seen 2 main approaches to this sort of situation and a 
3rd option that doesn't seem to get relied on (thankfully)  

1.  Is to have a page with a "Table of Contents" at the top with headings for 
"Debian Family", "Redhat Family" and then maybe a couple others since there are 
only about 4 different package management systems.  Adobe have managed to cut 
it down to a drop-down so that the whole page changes when you select the 
appropriate family but i think that variant is just asking for trouble.  

2.  One page deals with the normal way and then lists the 1 or 2 odd 
exceptions.  For example in one of the LibreOffice wiki-pages about re-naming 
the User Profile it gives
"For almost all distros
    * /home/<user name>/.libreoffice/3/user
There is always one that wants to be different for almost any 'rule'. This time 
with openSUSE apparently
    * /home/<user name>/.lo3/
NB: the openSUSE way allows the installation of downloaded versions alongside 
the openSUSE version of LibreOffice. More about openSUSE version of Libreoffice.
"
The "more about" was a clickable link to the  openSuSE page

3.  Links to external documentation held in each different distros wiki and no 
attempt to check to see if the link still works let alone whether their 
information is still up-to-date.  



The main reason i am suggesting Evo host a wiki-page on the Evo wiki is that 
Ubuntu Community don't seem to be very reliable with regards to Evo, so the 
choice seems to be 

1.  to give up on all Ubuntu users and blame them for the failings of their 
distro 

2.  to take control of the situation in-house

I have just checked which version of Evo is available on the 12.04, which is 
going to be supported in some way  until late April 2017.  So questions about 
the 3.2.3 release of Evo are going to keep cropping up on this list for the 
next 4 years!  Personally i think it would be easiest to have 1 link that can 
be given to cover how to upgrade from that rather than try to remember 
specifics about the peculiarities of Ubuntu's fairly unique PPA system each 
time.  

Regards from
Tom :)  
_______________________________________________
evolution-list mailing list
[email protected]
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

Reply via email to