On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 21:26, Tony Earnshaw wrote: > > I don't understand -- maybe it's just your gratuitous use of HTML making > > your message appear differently to everything else that doesn't land in > > the spam bin, and hence causing my limited brain to have difficulty > > understanding it. > > That's a bit unfair, isn't it?
What's unfair? Calling my own brain limited or filing HTML in the spam bin? The former is indisputably true -- I _did_ find Steven's mail hard to read because it appeared differently. The latter is indeed unfair but is my own choice and in fact seems to have a relatively low rate of false positives (defined as an HTML mail I actually wanted to read which wasn't exempted on grounds of being in a mailing list to which I'm subscribed, etc.). I file crap matching 'Subject: Re: ' but having no References: or In-Reply-To: headers to the spam bin too. -- dwmw2 _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
