Well its actually a bug in the pop server, it isn't saying it supports uidl which it should if it does, assuming it does, which i guess it would.
Its a known issue, although i can't say when it will be fixed :-/ On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 22:42, Malte Erikson wrote: > On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 17:39, Dan Winship wrote: > > > There's a known issue that many buggy pop servers support UIDL even > > > though they say they dont, or at least, they dont say they do, which > > > they're supposed to. > > > > Ah. In 1.0, if the server didn't support CAPA, Evo would try UIDL > > anyway. Looks like it doesn't do that in 1.2. That could be why 1.2 is > > slower for him. > > Dan, Not Zed! > > I'm expericing the same as Jeffery, also having alot of messages in the > InBox I POP from (a Exchange 5.5 server). > > I fired up evolution-mail with CAMEL_DEBUG_VERBOSE active, and evo-mail > did execute 3500 TOP commands before I'm receiving any mail. Every time > evolution is checking for mail, it probably are executing all these TOP > commands. Anyway, it takes about 30s each time before I'm retrieving any > mail. This was alot faster in the 1.0.x series. Should I file a bug, or > are you planning to do anything to fasten up the process? > > -- > / Malte > > _______________________________________________ > evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
