> > What are the error messages?
> > Have you tried with debugging enabled?
>
> Got a bit further this morning, yes. Running evolution-mail and
> evolution-addressbook from a term as myself (strace SO to a file
> and lessing) showed the new glib playing up. Relevant bits:
>
> getuid32() = 500 (500 is uid tonye)
>
> connect(3, {sin_family=AF_UNIX, path="/var/run/.nscd_socket"},
> 110) = -1 ECONNREFUSED (Connection refused)
>
> write(2, "getpwuid_r(): failed due to: No "..., 46getpwuid_r():
> failed due to: No such user 500.) = 46
No such user?
Hopefully someone who already compiled Evo 1.3.92 on his own can speak
up. I am afraid, I won't be too much of help for you...
> >>I had to get Mozilla 1.3b working for mail PDQ (filters and all), all my
> >>mail is in IMAP anyway, so I'm none the worse off.
> >
> > Mozilla 1.3 (final) ist released for weeks, 1.4 beta is current. ;-)
>
> Probably. I have a dialup connection and have to ration myself.
Very good point. Dial up, poor Tony. DSL flatrate here, download doesn't
bother me... :-)
> >>Having got this far, I don't really want to get back to where I was.
> >>What I'd like to do, is have a go at compiling Evo 1.3. Is this
> >>reasonably possible for mortals? Could Guenther please comment?
> >
> > For the split of a second I could see a glow enlightening the room, as
> > my karma grows and all the mysteries of the universe suddenly became so
> > clear to me... ;-)
>
> The mystery of the Universe was revealed many years ago by
> Douglas Adams. For the rest, I know what you are capable of and
> we know each other :-)
Sure, and I would love to help more.
Unfortunately, that's some of the books I always wanted to read. You
don't wanna know, how much unread books are wasting space right beside
me -- neither do I. Maybe I can catch up a little bit the next week,
while I am forced offline...
> > Sorry Tony, never tried compiling Evolution myself. I always wanted to,
> > seems like a reasonable start.
> >
> > Have you considered giving the RH 8.0 packages a shot, as your 7.2 box
> > is highly updated? (seems to be the first RH system with 1.3.92 RPMs)
> > ftp://ftp.ximian.com/pub/ximian-evolution-beta/redhat-80-i386
>
> No. A lot of the RH 8 stuff would fail on Gnome and KDE
> dependencies.
Think, you are right. Although you really should blame RH for Evolution
dependencies on KDE... ;-)
> > Why is RH 7.2 so important to you, if I may ask?
>
> I have a stable notebook with an awful lot of Internet server
> stuff on it that I have to demonstrate. If I were to install from
> new, a: it would take weeks, and b: I'd insist on a new machine
> to do it on. then it would be RH 9, with all the problems that gives.
What about a second partition for your working environment besides the
demo system?
> Thanks, Guenther!
You're welcome, every time again...
...guenther
--
char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
_______________________________________________
evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
