On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 21:02, Norman P. B. Joseph wrote:
> I've had great luck with SpamAssassin 2.55. I have a filter rule that
> runs "spamc -c -f" on incoming e-mail, and files the hits in a separate
> spam folder I check occasionally. Whenever spamassassin misses one and
> it ends up in my inbox, I run it through "sa-learn --spam --single", and
> on the odd occasion I get a false positive in the spam folder, I run
> that through "sa-learn --ham --single". Works like a charm.
Despite the fact, that SA is *not* designed for catching virus but
SPAM... Judging from the general design of SA, this more a coincidence,
it it works at all.
...guenther
--
char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
_______________________________________________
evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
