On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 15:14, guenther wrote: > On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 21:02, Norman P. B. Joseph wrote: > > I've had great luck with SpamAssassin 2.55. I have a filter rule that > > runs "spamc -c -f" on incoming e-mail, and files the hits in a separate > > spam folder I check occasionally. Whenever spamassassin misses one and > > it ends up in my inbox, I run it through "sa-learn --spam --single", and > > on the odd occasion I get a false positive in the spam folder, I run > > that through "sa-learn --ham --single". Works like a charm. > > Despite the fact, that SA is *not* designed for catching virus but > SPAM... Judging from the general design of SA, this more a coincidence, > it it works at all.
DOH! <emily latella> Never mind. <\emily latella> -- Norman Joseph, Systems Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] IC|XC Concurrent Technologies Corporation 814/269.2633 --+-- Global Systems Center NI|KA *** Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a great battle *** _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
