On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 21:04, Ettore Perazzoli wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 14:29, guenther wrote:
> > > For 2.0 we are should probably change the offline behavior so that it
> > > starts caching all the messages in the background when you connect so
> > > you have a copy of all messages at all times. Michael also had some
> > > neat ideas about providing configurable filters to decide what gets
> > > cached...
> >
> > Sounds like a perfect match for the IMAP rewrite.
>
> Actually, Michael mentioned that this is doable with the current IMAP
> implementation.
yep, right
> > And wasn't IMAP rewrite scheduled for 1.6? Or was it delayed again?
>
> I think we are just skipping 1.6 as a version number. :-)
>
> I don't know how much of the IMAP stuff we can do for 2.0. Since it
> seems a sizeable chunk of work and we are resource-limited it sounds
> like the best approach would be to develop this in parallel with 2.0 but
> not make it a blocker for 2.0.
Well, if you would ask me (as if I don't know you won't ask me), finish
1.6 ASAP and let 2.0 brew a little bit. And have that IMAP rewrite high
priority for 1.6 anyway.
<comment type="insider">
Seems, I'm feeling argumentative today, too.
</comment>
...guenther
--
char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
_______________________________________________
evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
